Two Challenges to the Dualist Interpretation of Plato’s Thought: The Nonexistence of the “Two-Worlds” Theory in Plato’s Dialogues and Their Dialogical Nature

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20911/21799024v16n2p11/2025

Abstract

This article intends to demonstrate two limits to the usual dualist interpretation of Plato’s thought, by (1) defending the nonexistence of the so-called “two-worlds theory” (cosmological dualism) in his dialogues and by (2) pointing out that the nature and form of his dialogues, characterized by a certain dramaticity, contrast with and challenge proposals for the systematic dogmatization of his thought. Since the alleged Platonic dualisms, such as the anthropological (between body and soul) and the ontological-epistemological (between the sensible and the intelligible), are rooted in cosmological dualism (between the sensible world and the world of Forms/Ideas) in systematic interpretations of the Athenian philosopher, (1) and (2) support the conclusion that the dualist interpretation of Plato is unfounded.

KEYWORDS: Platonic cosmology. χώρα (chōra). Dialogical genre. Dramaticity.

Published

2026-01-20

How to Cite

Vasconcelos, H. M. de. (2026). Two Challenges to the Dualist Interpretation of Plato’s Thought: The Nonexistence of the “Two-Worlds” Theory in Plato’s Dialogues and Their Dialogical Nature. Pensar-Revista Eletrônica Da FAJE, 16(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.20911/21799024v16n2p11/2025